I'm not sure what it actually means for the state to "cut off" money for UNO, but I would like to point out that the work of parent advocates is actually what got the Inspector General on the case.
I'm also not sure what the consequences of such a move will be, either. UNO is a debt-accumulation machine--- that state money is already spent!
I think we'll learn down the road that "cut off" means something other than what we think it means.
Interesting that this investigation--and the pyramid scheme that these state grant funds support--seem not to concern the Board of Education. Despite these and numerous other red flags, UNO's request to expand was approved by the Board, perhaps even unanimously and without discussion.
ReplyDelete